Decision - Oast House/Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Wellbeing Centre
Decision details
Oast House/Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Wellbeing Centre
Decision Maker: Development Sub-Committee
Decision status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: Yes
Purpose:
To present a pre-application report to the
Committee before going out to public consultation
Decision:
The Committee resolved to:
1. Agree the key objectives which the Council is looking to achieve from the wider site as set out in paragraph 2.4 of the report, and
2. Agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House/Kingston Road site (Option 1).
Report author: Heather Morgan
Publication date: 05/01/2022
Date of decision: 05/01/2022
Decided at meeting: 05/01/2022 - Development Sub-Committee
Effective from: 11/01/2022
This decision has been called in by:
- Councillor Malcolm Beecher who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
- Sinead Mooney who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
- Councillor Denise Saliagopoulos who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
- Councillor Joanne Sexton who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
- Councillor Chris Bateson who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
- Councillor Veena Siva who writes In discussion of the Oast House / Kingston Road Car Park and Health & Well-being Centre, the Development Sub-committee resolved "to agree the preferred option for the residential element of the Oast House / Kingston Road site (Option 1)." We believe this decision ought to be reserved to Council in that: 1. The sub-committee rejected an amendment to the wording of Option 1 to allow "up to 14 and 10 storeys. 2. The sub-committee to give sufficient consideration and weight to the risk identified by the council officers that Option 1 was the only option likely to be rejected by the Planning Committee. Thus, the Asset Management team will waste time and money developing a scheme the runs the serious risk of rejection, with no appeal. 3. The sub-committee rejected the advice and recommendation of the Staines councillors not to pursue a scheme over 9 and 7 storeys. And in so doing also rejected the wishes of local residents, council tax payers, as they responded to a recent consultation by the council."
Accompanying Documents:
- Dev Sub - oast house and staines HW centre 12.21 final PDF 355 KB
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Appendix B KGE STRATEGY 2021-v6 PDF 2 MB
- Appendix C dev Sub and CPRC 29.11.21 PDF 188 KB
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Timeline - Dev Sub - oast house and staines HW centre 11.21 App G PDF 11 KB
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted
- Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted