Decision Maker: Council, Development Sub-Committee
Decision status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
It was proposed by Councillor N. Gething, Seconded by Councillor J. Boughtflower and resolved that the public and press be excluded during consideration of this item, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) because it was likely to disclose information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information) and in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority and potentially the selected provider in a competitive procurement process by allowing other bidders to know the financial position of the Council and the selected provider. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the procurement process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to achieve the most economically advantageous contract and (iii) might dissuade organisations bidding for the Council's tenders if their commercial information was put into the public domain.
It was proposed by Councillor R Noble and seconded by Councillor L Nichols and resolved to agree the recommendations as set out in the report.
A recorded vote was requested.
OPTION |
COUNCILLORS |
For (27) |
Mayor I. Harvey, M. Attewell, C. Barratt, R. Barratt, C. Bateson, M. Beecher, J. Boughtflower, A. Brar, S. Buttar, J. Button, R. Chandler, N. Gething, K. Grant, T. Harman, N. Islam, V. Leighton, T. Mitchell, S. Mooney, L. Nichols, R. Noble, O. Rybinski, J. Sexton, R. Sider BEM, V. Siva, R. Smith-Ainsley and J. Vinson |
Against (0) |
|
Abstain (1) |
H. Harvey |
Publication date: 31/03/2022
Date of decision: 10/03/2022
Decided at meeting: 10/03/2022 - Council
Accompanying Documents: