Forward plan

Cabinet Forward Plan - 1 (01/06/2017 to 30/09/2017, Cabinet)

Plan items
No.	Item
1.	Property acquisition C Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 02 06 2017 Lead officer: Heather Morgan Decision status: Implemented Notice of proposed decision first published: 12/04/2017 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: This report contains exempt information within the meaning of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 and by the Local Government (Access to information) (Variation) Order 2006 Paragraph 3 – Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information) and in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
2.	Contaminated Land Strategy Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Tracey Willmott-French Decision status: Implemented Notice of proposed decision first published: 23/03/2016 Anticipated restriction: Open -
3.	Adoption of Spelthorne’s Corporate Health and Safety Policy New! Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Tracey Willmott-French Decision status: Implemented Notice of proposed decision first published: 25/05/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
4.	Telecare and Span funding Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Janice Lowin Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 05/05/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
5.	Provisional Revenue Outturn 2016/17 Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Adrian Flynn Decision status: Information Only Notice of proposed decision first published: 10/02/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
6.	Provisional Capital Outturn Report 2016/17 New! Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Adrian Flynn Decision status: Information Only Notice of proposed decision first published: 25/05/2017
7.	Treasury Management Strategy Annual report Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 21 06 2017 Lead officer: Terry Collier Decision status: Information Only Notice of proposed decision first published: 10/02/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
8.	Play and Refreshment facilities at Lammas Recreation Ground - Key Decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 19 07 2017 Lead officer: Jackie Taylor Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 05/05/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
9.	Property Acquisition D New! Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 13 07 2017 Lead officer: Heather Morgan Decision status: Information Only Notice of proposed decision first published: 25/05/2017 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: This report contains exempt information within the meaning of paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 and by the Local Government (Access to information) (Variation) Order 2006): Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information) and in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.