Forward plan

Cabinet Forward Plan - 8 (01/04/2019 to 31/07/2019, Cabinet)

Plan items
No.	Item
1.	Local Plan Working Party recommendations Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 27 03 2019 Lead officer: Ann Biggs Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 26/02/2019
2.	Exempt Report - Decision on award of contract for the provision of a Property Management System Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 27 03 2019 Lead officer: Leigh Street Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 01/02/2019 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: It would be too speculative at this time to give an indication of contract value to the market. To disclose information as this stage might distort price submissions in any tender processes that are held in the future.
3.	Exempt Report - West Wing, procurement of construction services - Key Decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 27 03 2019 Lead officer: Richard Mortimer Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 26/02/2019 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding procurement of contracts by allowing other parties to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the procurement process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to place contracts for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
4.	Review of Knowle Green Estates Ltd Decision maker: Cabinet Decision due: 29 01 2020 Lead officer: Michael Graham Decision status: Information Only Notice of proposed decision first published: 02/11/2017 Anticipated restriction: Part exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: Confidential business strategy of the Company included in the appendix to the report
5.	Exempt report - Acquisition V - Key decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 27 03 2019 Lead officer: Nick Cummings Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
6.	Public Space Protection Orders Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 17 07 2019 Lead officer: Michael Graham Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 28/06/2018 Anticipated restriction: Open -
7.	Exempt report - Acquisition W - Key decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 11 09 2019 Originally due: 25 09 2019 Lead officer: Nick Cummings Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018 This decision will be taken under urgency procedures. Reason for urgency: In order to secure the property on favourable terms the Council needs to progress with the acquisition with due haste as one would expect with commercial property negotiations. The offer for the property will be strengthened considerably if it is backed by a decision by Cabinet to authorise the purchase. It is therefore not possible to defer the decision until the expiry of 28 working days for the publication of notices under the regulations, as this would put the Council at a considerable disadvantage in the negotiations. Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
8.	Exempt report - Acquisition X - Key decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 25 09 2019 Lead officer: Nick Cummings Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
9.	Exempt report - Acquisition Y - Key decision Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 04 12 2019 Originally due: 24 04 2019 Lead officer: Nick Cummings Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
10.	Exempt report - Acquisition Z Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 08 04 2020 Lead officer: Nick Cummings Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.
11.	Review of Polling Stations Decision maker: Council Decision: 19 12 2019 Lead officer: Michael Graham Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 02/11/2017 Anticipated restriction: Open -
12.	Housing Strategy 2020-2025 New! Decision maker: Cabinet, Council Decision: 27 02 2020 Lead officer: David Birley Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 08/03/2019 Anticipated restriction: Open -
13.	Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy 2020-2025 New! Decision maker: Cabinet Decision: 15 07 2020 Lead officer: David Birley Decision status: Recommendations Approved Notice of proposed decision first published: 08/03/2019 Anticipated restriction: Open -