Forward plan

Detailed Revenue Budget 2020/21

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Terry Collier

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Fees and Charges 2020/21 - Key Decision

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   26 02 2020

Lead officer:  Laurence Woolven

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 30/09/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Capital Strategy 2020-2025

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Terry Collier, Nick Cummings

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Pay Award 2020/21

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Debbie O'Sullivan

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Capital Programme 2020/21 to 2023/24

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Laurence Woolven

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Members' Allowances Scheme 2020-2021 - Key Decision

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Gillian Scott

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Annual Revenue Grants 2020/21 - Key Decision

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Tracy Reynolds

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Food Safety and Health and Safety 2020/2021 Service Plans

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   26 02 2020

Lead officer:  Fidelma Bahoshy

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Revenue Monitoring Report

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision due:   26 02 2020

Lead officer:  Laurence Woolven

Decision status:  Information Only

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Capital Monitoring Report

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision due:   26 02 2020

Lead officer:  Laurence Woolven

Decision status:  Information Only

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Exempt report - Specialist housing management and resident support service for the White House Hostel New!

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   26 02 2020

Lead officer:  David Birley

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 10/02/2020

This decision will be taken under urgency procedures.

Reason for urgency:
The completion of both the competitive tender process, and the design of a Direct Delivery Model is likely to take at least six months. Either route will require a mobilisation period of at least three months, which leaves just three months contingency for any issues which may arise along the way.

The Council is under a contractual obligation with Homes England to complete and start to occupy the hostel by the end of March 2021. Commencing the design of alternative delivery routes immediately will allow sufficient time for a provider to mobilise in advance of this date, and be party to key decisions during the final stages of the build, including the types of furniture, fixtures and fittings, and well as finalise operational logistics of running the hostel. Failure to complete and start to occupy the hostel by the end of March 2021 will put £2m funding at risk, which is 50% of the cost of construction.

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in a competitive procurement process by allowing other bidders to know the financial position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the procurement process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to achieve a competitive price and good value for money.

Exempt report - Business Waste Collection Service

Decision maker:  Cabinet, Council

Decision:   27 02 2020

Lead officer:  Graham Boswell

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/08/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Exempt report - Property Letting 'B'

Notice of proposed decision first published: 18/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the position of the authority during the negotiation of the terms of the letting of this property.

Exempt report - Property Letting 'C'

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the position of the authority during the negotiation of the terms of the letting of this property.

Exempt report - Acquisition Z

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   08 04 2020

Lead officer:  Nick Cummings

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/12/2018

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.

Exempt report - Acquisition AA - Key Decision

Decision maker:  Property and Investment Committee

Decision:   14 09 2020

Lead officer:  Nick Cummings

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.

Exempt report - Property Letting 'D'

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the position of the authority during the negotiation of the terms of the letting of this property.

Exempt report - Property Letting 'E'

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the position of the authority during the negotiation of the terms of the letting of this property.

Exempt report - Acquisition AB - Key Decision

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.

Exempt report - Acquisition AC - Key Decision

Notice of proposed decision first published: 30/09/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.

Asset Management Plan

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   23 09 2020

Lead officer:  Heather Morgan

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 15/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Corporate Plan Review

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/08/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Sandbag Policy

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   03 12 2020

Lead officer:  Nick Moon

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Health and Wellbeing Strategy

Notice of proposed decision first published: 30/09/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Riverside Arts Centre - lease

Notice of proposed decision first published: 04/11/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy 2020-2025

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   15 07 2020

Lead officer:  David Birley

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 08/03/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Corporate Health and Safety Policy

Decision maker:  Corporate Policy and Resources Committee

Decision:   14 03 2022

Originally due:   24 03 2021

Lead officer:  Tracey Willmott-French

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 06/02/2020

Anticipated restriction: Open  -

Exempt report - Thameside House construction budget - Key Decision

Notice of proposed decision first published: 29/03/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Exempt report - Property Letting 'F'

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the position of the authority during the negotiation of the terms of the letting of this property.

Exempt report - Acquisition AD - Key Decision

Notice of proposed decision first published: 30/09/2019

Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt  - view reasons

Explanation of anticipated restriction:
In all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because, disclosure to the public would prejudice the financial position of the authority in the bidding process for the site by allowing other bidders to know the position of the Council. This in turn prejudices the Council by (i) distorting the bids process and (ii) prejudicing the opportunity for the Council to acquire a site through the Council for the prudent management of its financial affairs.

Public Space Protection Order - Injunction (Unlawful Encampments)

Decision maker:  Cabinet

Decision:   24 03 2021

Lead officer:  Karen Limmer

Decision status:  Recommendations Approved

Notice of proposed decision first published: 27/06/2019

Anticipated restriction: Open  -